Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Bye-bye Blogger!

It had to happen eventually: I've abandoned Blogger for WordPress on my own server. As of today, I won't be updating this blog anymore.

The new address is http://www.cruachan.ca/~gordon/blog/

See you there!

Sunday, October 09, 2005

Hockey's BACK!


Well, it never really left, did it? But, the Campbell men's maturing Saturday-night tradition is back! Our beloved Leafs lost to those darned Habs, but it was fun to check out the new rules and nice to be back in the chair again.

It started during the 1976-77 season: my paternal grandfather moved in with us and I started watching Hockey Night in Canada (as much of it as I could get away with: usually the first period and the Peter Puck segment) with him every Saturday night. He was a Montreal fan (Guy Lafleur in particular) and I picked up a love of the game from him. We only had two seasons before he got sick, but hockey with Grampa was a very important part of my week. So much so, that Phil and I started watching the games partway through the 2003-04 season. Once he learned who to cheer for, all was good. :-)

Then, the lockout hit. Now, more than a year later, we're finally back on track and judging by last night's game, it's back on track with the rules changes. I'm still not sure about the penalty for knocking the puck over the glass (even if it's accidental), but the rest of it has sped things up a heck of a lot. Yow!

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

LVEC decision delayed

In what has to be considered a partial victory for KCAL and other LVEC opponents, Kingston City Council has decided to look at another site downtown for the LVEC project.

A "last-minute" amendment by Councillor George Sutherland to look at the "North Block" saved the project from the dustbin. It's a four-block area downtown, bounded by Place D'Armes, Ontario, Queen & Wellington Streets. The problem is that King Harvey's Task Force has already looked at the site once and rejected it and the parking and traffic problems still remain the same: very little of the former and too much of the latter.

I'm questioning the "last-minute" nature of the amendment on a couple of grounds: when he introduced it, Councillor Sutherland used the phrase "As you know, Your Worship, I cannot support the Anglin Bay site ...". Obviously, there was a discussion at some earlier point about this. Then, during debate on the amendment, His Majesty pulled out a prepared speech on the matter. Oh, it was a surprise all right ...

I still don't understand what's wrong with the Memorial Centre site. (It's the big grey square in the centre of the map) The city owns it, so property acquisition is nil; it has astronomically better road access and loads of parking room.

It's interesting to note that Deputy Mayor Foster seems to be viewing any opposition to the Anglin Bay site as a personal attack. She chaired the committee that selected that dog's breakfast in the first place. When Council finally listens to the will of the voters (our petition drive is over 4,000 signatures) and chooses an appropriate site that won't impact so heavily on its surroundings, she's going to find herself out in the cold if she doesn't change her attitude in a big hurry.
-->